Rick Perry And Texas Job Numbers

Full disclosure: I don’t like Rick Perry for our next president. I have my reasons that aren’t worth going into here. However, when I was watching the GOP debate and pro-Perry people started bringing up Rick Perry’s job numbers as a cudgel against other candidates, I looked into the BLS data on Texas jobs. Having familiarized myself with the data, I started noticing claims on the Texas jobs data that started popping up that directly contradicted what I was seeing in the data. So I wanted to clear up a couple of these common misconceptions.

Note: If you are going to comment and you want to introduce some new objection to the Texas job numbers, you MUST provide original data. I spent about 4 hours digging through raw data to write this post. I don’t want you to point to some pundit or blog post and take it on their authority, because I’ve already researched several idiot pundits who are talking directly out of their asses when it comes to the data. I want you to point to the raw data that I can examine for myself. This means links. I refuse to waste any more of my time on speculative bullshit or “Well, I’ll wager that the Texas jobs don’t really count because…” If you’re willing to wager, take that money and put it towards finding the actual data. In short, put up or shut up.

I’m not cranky, I swear.

Anyway, let’s deal with the complaints in no particular order:

“Texas has an unemployment rate of 8.2%. That’s hardly exceptional.”

See… that’s what I thought when I started looking at the data. I knew that Utah had a lower unemployment rate than Texas and I kept hearing that Texas was go great at jobs, blah, blah, blah, so I looked up the unemployment rate.

Nothing special.

So I was going to drive my point home that Texas was nothing special by looking at their raw employment numbers and reporting on those. That’s when I saw this:

This may not look like anything special, but I’ve been looking closely at employment data for a couple years now and I’ve become very accustomed to seeing data that looks like this.

In a “normal” employment data set, we can easily look at it and say “Yep, that’s where the recession happened. Sucks to be us.” But not with Texas. With Texas, we say “Damn. Looks like they’ve recovered already.”

(To get to this data, go to this link http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/dsrv?la then select the state or states you want, the select “Statewide”, then select the states again, then select the metrics you want to see.)

But if Texas has so many jobs, why do they have such a high unemployment rate? Let’s take a closer look at that data.

As a percentage of the number of pre-recession jobs, here is a chart of the growth of a selection of states. (For clarity, in this chart I selected a number of the largest states and tried to focus on states that have relatively good economic reputations. I did not chart all 50 states b/c it would have taken me too long.)

We can see that Texas has grown the fastest, having increased jobs by 2.2% since the recession started. I want to take a moment and point out that second place is held by North Dakota. I added North Dakota to my list of states  to show something very important. North Dakota currently has the lowest unemployment rate of any state at 3.2%. And yet Texas is adding jobs at a faster rate than North Dakota. How can this be?

The reason is that people are flocking to Texas in massive numbers. Starting at the beginning of the recession (December 2007), let’s look at how this set of states have grown in their labor force.

As you can see, Texas isn’t just the fastest growing… it’s growing over twice as fast as the second fastest state and three times as fast as the third. Given that Texas is (to borrow a technical term) f***ing huge, this growth is incredible.

People are flocking to Texas in massive numbers. This is speculative, but it *seems* that people are moving to Texas looking for jobs rather than moving to Texas for a job they already have lined up. This would explain why Texas is adding jobs faster than any other state but still has a relatively high unemployment rate.

“Sure, Texas has lots of jobs, but they’re mostly low-paying/minimum wage jobs”

Let’s look at the data. Here’s a link: Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates

Texas median hourly wage is $15.14…  almost exactly in the middle of the pack (28th out of 51 regions). Given that they’ve seen exceptional job growth (and these other states have not) this does not seem exceptionally low.

But the implication here is that the new jobs in Texas, the jobs that Texas seems to stand alone in creating at such a remarkable pace, are low paying jobs and don’t really count.

If this were true, all these new low-paying jobs should be dragging down the wages data, right? But if we look at the wages data since the beginning of the recession (click to enlarge, states are listed alphabetically)

And it turns out that the opposite is true. Since the recession started hourly wages in Texas have increased at a 6th fastest pace in the nation.

As a side note, the only blue state that has faster growing wages is Hawaii. Just thought I’d get that jab in since so many people have been making snarky “Yeah, I could get a job in Texas is I wanted to flip burgers!” comments at me on Twitter.

“Texas is oil country and the recent energy boom is responsible for the incredible jobs increase.”

In identifying “energy jobs” I cast as wide a net as possible. If you want to replicate my findings, go to this link: http://www.bls.gov/sae/data.htm, click on “One-Screen Data Search”, then select “Texas”, then select “Statewide”, then in Supersectors select “Mining and Logging”, “Non-Durable Goods” and “Transportation and Utilities” and then in Industries select “Mining and Logging”, “Natural Gas Distribution”, “Electric Power Generation” and “Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing”.

Tedious, I know, but transparency is important and this is how you get the data.

When we finally get the data, we discover that energy isn’t really the biggest part of the Texas economy. Increases in jobs in the energy sector (or closely related to it) account for about 25% of the job increases in the last year. Since the energy sector only makes up 3% of all employment, there is some truth to this claim.

However, take the energy sector completely out of the equation and Texas is still growing faster than any other state. This indicates to us that the energy sector is not a single sector saving Texas from the same economic fate as the rest of the states. It’s not hurting, but Texas would still be growing like a weed without it.

“Texas has 100,000 unsustainable public sector jobs that inflate the growth numbers.”

I’m not sure where this one comes from, but the numbers are these (and can be found by selecting government employment from the data wizard at this link http://www.bls.gov/sae/data.htm):

Counting from the beginning of the recession (December 2007) the Texas public sector has grown 3.8%, or a little under 70,000 employees. This is faster than normal employment, but it’s not off the charts.

Given that the Texas economy has grown so much and private sector jobs have grown so much, that doesn’t strike me as an unsustainable growth in the public sector.

But, just in case you’re really worried about it, you can lay your fears to rest because in the last year the Texas public sector has shrunk by 26,000 jobs. In the last 12 months, Texas lost 31,300 federal employees, trimmed 3,800 state jobs, and increased local government jobs by 8,400 jobs.

(To be fair, this was partially driven by the role Texas employees played in the census, which inflated federal job numbers this time last year. Since the census numbers stabilized, federal employment has been at about break-even.)

As you can see, we’re nowhere near the “100,000 unsustainable jobs” number.

My Personal Favorite Chart

I’ll leave you with my personal favorite chart. I mentioned at the beginning that Texas is seeing high unemployment in a large part because they’re growing so damn fast. The problem with this from a charts and graphs perspective is that it leaves worse states off the hook, making them look better than they actually are. Looking at unemployment alone, we would conclude that Wisconsin has a better economy than Texas. But Wisconsin is still 120K short of it’s pre-recession numbers. The only reason they look better than Texas is because 32,000 people fled the state.

During that time, 739,000 people fled into Texas. Anyone who takes that data and pretends that this is somehow bad news for Texas is simply not being honest. At the worst, I’d call it a good problem to have.

So, to give something of a better feeling for the economic situation across states, this chart takes the population of the states I selected above and judges the current job situation against the population as it stood at the beginning of the recession.

Using that metric, Texas would have a very low unemployment rate of 2.3%. But the fact that unemployment in the United States is fluid means that the unemployed flock to a place where there are jobs, which inflates its unemployment rate (at least in the short term). It’s not a bad thing for Texas… it just looks bad when dealing with the isolated “unemployment %” statistic.

UPDATE: @francisgagnon on Twitter felt that this chart was dishonest because it charts Texas as having 2.3% unemployment and (in his words so I don’t get him wrong): “It assumes immigrants create no jobs. But more people = more consumers = more jobs.”

He is absolutely right about this. I tried to be clear above that this chart doesn’t account for the fluid nature of an economy with immigration and departures of hundreds of thousands of people, but I don’t want to leave anyone with the wrong impression. So here it is: This chart doesn’t account for the fluid nature of an economy with immigrations and departures of hundreds of thousands of people. The point of this chart is not to say “Texas should have 2.3% unemployment if only things were fair.” Instead, it is an attempt to chart job growth in such a way that controls for people leaving one job market to enter another. To say “Wisconsin has a better job market than Texas because its unemployment rate is 0.6% lower” is a wholly untrue statement even though it cites accurate numbers. What this chart is meant to do is not posit a counter-factual, but to give a visual representation of the employment reality that is obscured by the way we calculate unemployment numbers.


And… that’s it.

You may have noticed that I don’t mention Rick Perry very much here. That is because Rick Perry is, in my opinion, ancillary to this entire discussion. He was governor while these these numbers happened, so good for him. Maybe that means these jobs they are his “fault”. Maybe the job situation is the result of his policies. Or maybe Texas is simply the least bad option in a search for a favorable economic climate.

That is not an argument I’m having at this exact moment. My point is to show that most of the “excuses” you will hear about Texas’ job statistics are based in nothing more than a hope that Rick Perry had nothing to do with them and not on a sound understanding of the data.

My advice to anti-Perry advocates is this: Give up talking about Texas jobs. Texas is an incredible outlier among the states when it comes to jobs. Not only are they creating them, they’re creating ones with higher wages.

One can argue that Perry had very little to do with the job situation in Texas, but such a person should be probably prepare themselves for the consequences of that line of reasoning. If Rick Perry had nothing to do with creating jobs in Texas, than why does Obama have something to do with creating jobs anywhere? And why would someone advocate any sort of “job creating” policies if policies don’t seem to matter when it comes to the decade long governor of Texas? In short, it seems to me that this line of reasoning, in addition to sounding desperate and partisan, hogties its adherents into a position where they are simultaneously saying that government doesn’t create jobs while arguing for a set of policies where government will create jobs.

Or, to an uncharitable eye, it seem they are saying “Policies create jobs when they are policies I like. They don’t create jobs when they are policies I dislike.”

People will continue to argue about the data. But hopefully this will be helpful in sorting out reality from wishful and desperate thinking. I mentioned on Twitter that the Texas jobs situation was nothing short of miraculous. This is why I said that and why I’m standing by that statement.


  1. Beritiana says:

    we can notice you’re such a hard worker, good step for fame.http://www.whoisdominio.net

  2. Eduardo says:

    this subject can give us a great discussion, thanks for sharing it.http://www.divulgaemail.com

  3. Deodira says:

    i like what you are saying. great post.http://www.detetizar.com

  4. Ariadna says:

    hi, great article. thanks for the opportunity to learn even more.http://www.maritimasaude.com

  5. Emanuela says:

    i loved your website, it always help me when i want to understand more about some subject, thanks a lot for helping us to get this information.http://www.etiquetaplastica.com

  6. Edna says:

    great website. have bookmarked. thanks.http://www.detetizadoras.net

  7. Deusa says:

    this is very nice one and gives in depth information. i think it will be helpful. thank you very much for that extraordinarily first class editorial! keep up the good work.http://www.plansaude.com

  8. Aldalgisa says:

    thank you for the info, it really helps.http://www.dominiodisponivel.net

  9. Demilde says:

    interesting stuff, i might search for more information about this, thanks a lot friend.http://www.registrodesite.net

  10. Arlene says:

    really informative post, i am truly happy to post my comment on your blog. i’m glad that you shared this helpful info with us.http://www.planosodontologicos.org

  11. FelijelisUg says:

    “Roettgen presently has to answer to make the most severe featuring among the dog’s person on the Rhine and additionally Ruhr, you aren’t their own half-hearted (struggle) coming from the beginning (of a advertising and marketing campaign),In checked out someone discourse about U . k . report Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. [url=http://www.longchampbagssingapore.com]longchamp bag[/url]
    As being Roettgen is going to be exponentially considered as a fically with Merkel and additionally CDU’s likely chancellor student, their reluctance strengthened his particular untrustworthiness one among voters, so, who believed that routine living costs movie star sought after residing at the federal design towards keep in mind that circumstances far away from venture capital. [url=http://www.longchampbagssingapore.com]longchamp tote[/url]
    In spite of this, a state particular study demonstrated that voters declined strong belt-tightening programs or were originally fed up of cutting criminal system and in addition health to economise. A great deal more voters prefer SPD’s medical professional — an important go-slowly way to mowing owed money and an concentrate on work, incentives or success.

  12. sokobegekit says:

    Mark Bryant, qui sert à titre d’agent d’Andersen puis , a déclaré: «À ce les l’instant , le type de processus puis I transporter si vous voulez tout le intégrité pointant vers entre toutes les personnes impliquées Nous allons procéder à partir de . jeux de il ” [url=http://www.charmssoldes.com]bracelet thomas sabo[/url]
    Kevin Garnett a eu 28 points et | et, en outre que quatorze ans rebonds, frapper la à notre propre plomb à l’aide d’ au sujet ayant Game 6 jeudi soir, et le efficace ce particulier spécifique Atlanta Hawks 83-80 de séries éliminatoires du premier tour et mais aussi vers l’ensemble demi-finales de la Conférence Est cours toute cinquième victoire consécutive.
    [url=http://www.charmssoldes.com]thomas sabo lille[/url]
    L’ensemble du équipe a annoncé sa décision peu de temps antérieure à son Nuggets face mon par 6 sujet entre leur séries éliminatoires. Une sorte de équipe, a déclaré Anderson a été considérée comme était vraiment excusé », comme il il encore qui a l’exacte spécifique signalé enquête ” mais aussi a encore diminué commentaire. http://www.charmssoldes.com

  13. Cailane says:

    these kind of post are always inspiring and i prefer to read quality content so i’m happy to find many good point here in the post, writing is simply great, thank you for the posthttp://www.divulgaemail.com

  14. Amália says:

    you should publish more articles like this and you will be famous. you have the talent to become a super star. your article is superb. keep it up.http://www.realsaude.net

  15. [url=http://tradedoubler.altervista.org/blog_entry.php?user=carmrcxj&blogentry_id=20032]Luoghi associati con Brand new York[/url]

    [url=http://www.tennisplayersunited.com/development/index.php?do=/carmjinp/blog/guida-seo-marketing/]Guida SEO Marketing[/url]

    [url=http://help.clipflex.net/index.php?p=blogs/viewstory/165294]von keinerlei zus盲tzliche Kosten.[/url]

    [url=http://9web.tv/blogs/posts/bollomxl]w盲hrend du das machen.[/url]

    [url=http://webefriendz.com/friends2/index.php?p=blogs/viewstory/135461]come viaggi di nozze[/url]


  16. snaraamorie says:

    louis vuitton handbags
    [url=http://www.buylvaustraliaoutlet.com]louis vuitton bags[/url]
    louis vuitton handbags
    [url=http://www.buylvaustraliaoutlet.com]louis vuitton[/url]
    louis vuitton handbags

    louis vuitton handbags

  17. Edilaine says:

    excellent article , covers a lot of ground i’ve found a great article. thanks.http://www.paletesplasticos.com

  18. Alice says:

    educational post. you’re always making us learn something new, thanks.http://www.divulgaemail.com

  19. Its such as you learn my thoughts! You appear to know
    a lot approximately this, such as you wrote the guide in it or something.
    I think that you simply can do with some % to force the message home a little bit, but other than that,
    that is wonderful blog. A great read. I’ll certainly be back.

  20. heath hansen says:

    I…..just want to……thank you. thank you so much for this.

  21. Kate says:

    I live in Texas. Today I paid $3.03 a gallon for gas. Bought sweet corn 8/$3.00. We have no state taxes to rely on. No gambling to rely on. Perry has wooed many businesses toTexas. For example he got Carl’s hamburgers to move their headquarters here just to name one. So I don’t think I have it as bad as many do. The democrats don’t like Perry. They think he is attached to Bush. Not true. When we elect Govenor/Lt. gov. They run on separate tickets. So you can have Rep.Gov and Dem Lt Gov. He and bush were never running mates or buddies.

  22. […] The biggest threat to Obama comes from the success Texas has enjoyed economically.  Texas’ success is a direct result of our system of government and limited intervention.  Unlike California, our economic success has been a result of that limited intervention.  A detailed analysis of our economic success in Texas is illustrated here. […]

  23. […] sent their kids to die overseas, no single state could benefit, right? By the by, here’s an excellent actually mathematical treatment of Texas under Perry. It is much more illuminating than the from-the-hip theorizing Krugman loves […]

  24. […] the unemployment rate in other states would be even higher than it presently is.Political Math has a must-see set of charts demonstrating just how exceptional Texas’s position really is. His conclusion?You may have […]

  25. […] one-term governor of a medium-sized state — and his signature accomplishment in office was a strong job-creation record rather than shepherding the passage of a health care bill that is substantively similar to […]

  26. […] The biggest threat to Obama comes from the success Texas has enjoyed economically.  Texas’ success is a direct result of our system of government and limited intervention.  Unlike California, our economic success has been a result of that limited intervention.  A detailed analysis of our economic success in Texas is illustrated here. […]

  27. I am sure this paragraph has touched all the internet viewers, its really really fastidious post on building up new

  28. After looking at a handful of the blog articles on your site,
    I really appreciate your way of blogging. I saved
    it to my bookmark website list and will be checking
    back in the near future. Take a look at my web site as well and tell me how you feel.

  29. Greetings, I believe your blog could be having web browser compatibility issues.
    When I take a look at your web site in Safari, it looks fine however, when opening in IE,
    it has some overlapping issues. I just wanted to give you a
    quick heads up! Apart from that, fantastic blog!

  30. Arletha says:

    When some one searches for his required thing,
    therefore he/she needs to be available that in detail, thus that thing is maintained over here.

  31. Hey, I think your site might be having browser compatibility issues.

    When I look at your blog in Chrome, it looks fine but when opening in Internet
    Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up!
    Other then that, great blog!

  32. Hey there just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words
    in your content seem to be running off the screen in Safari.

    I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know.
    The style and design look great though! Hope
    you get the problem fixed soon. Kudos

  33. Ava says:

    I rarely drop responses, however after reading some of the responses on this page Political Math

  34. Colleen says:

    You can also add your colour pigment too at this stage.
    I also know that two wrongs do not make a right,
    although two lefts most certainly do. Effectiveness of any
    Hartz flea Control product depends on its proper and routine usage.

  35. […] Perry seemed to have two clear advantages over the rest of the field: his genuinely strong jobs record in Texas, and his engaged and confrontational style, which seemed to suit the Republican mood and […]

  36. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was curious what all is required to get setup? I’m assuming having a
    blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very web smart so I’m not
    100% sure. Any recommendations or advice would be greatly appreciated. Cheers

  37. Your method of describing all in this article is really good, all can simply
    be aware of it, Thanks a lot.

  38. Ulysses says:

    What you typed made a ton of sense. But, what about this?
    what if you were to write a killer headline? I mean, I don’t want to tell you how to run your website, however suppose you added a headline to maybe grab people’s attention?
    I mean Political Math

  39. Yes! Finally someone writes about baccarat games.

  40. shark vacuum says:

    Hi there excellent blog! Does running a blog such as this take a large amount of work?
    I’ve virtually no knowledge of programming however I was hoping to start my own blog soon. Anyway, should you have any recommendations or techniques for new blog owners please share. I know this is off subject but I simply needed to ask. Thanks a lot!

  41. Awesome issues here. I’m very happy to see your article. Thanks a lot and I am taking a look forward to touch you. Will you kindly drop me a mail?

  42. […] ‘splainin’. One thing that doesn’t need much, though, is his record on jobs. A local blogger, Matthias Shapiro, perhaps best known for his 1000 Pennies videos, walks us through why […]

  43. In the event it comes to composing superior articles you definitely are
    the don, congrats! ? !

  44. Hello I am so grateful I found your blog page,
    I really found you by accident, while I was searching on Aol
    for something else, Nonetheless I am here now and would just like to say thank
    you for a marvelous post and a all round interesting blog
    (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read through it all at the minute but I have book-marked it
    and also added in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to
    read a great deal more, Please do keep up the great work.

  45. Petra says:

    I believe everything published was actually very logical.
    But, what about this? suppose you were to write a awesome
    headline? I ain’t suggesting your information isn’t
    solid, however what if you added a title to maybe get folk’s attention? I mean Political Math