<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does a Republican Congress Create More Jobs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383</link>
	<description>Political Information Visualization and Other Math-y Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:17:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Doe Soetoro</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383&#038;cpage=1#comment-4997</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doe Soetoro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383#comment-4997</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see... at the end of 2006:  unemployment was 4.6%, prior GDP growth was +3.5%, &amp; the DOW was at 12,621.77.  George W. Bush with a Republican Congress set a record of 52 straight months of job creation.  Progressive-controlled Democrats took majority control of Congress starting January 2007.  Their political allies expressed desires to socialize America in the name of social justice and equality.

The economy must be looked at partially psychological.  If you push a massively expensive radical agenda, you will naturally create uncertainty and cause investors to pull back and sit on their money.  The outcome of doing so is easily understood by looking at any of the long-term liberal enclaves in many of our cities and states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230; at the end of 2006:  unemployment was 4.6%, prior GDP growth was +3.5%, &amp; the DOW was at 12,621.77.  George W. Bush with a Republican Congress set a record of 52 straight months of job creation.  Progressive-controlled Democrats took majority control of Congress starting January 2007.  Their political allies expressed desires to socialize America in the name of social justice and equality.</p>
<p>The economy must be looked at partially psychological.  If you push a massively expensive radical agenda, you will naturally create uncertainty and cause investors to pull back and sit on their money.  The outcome of doing so is easily understood by looking at any of the long-term liberal enclaves in many of our cities and states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obama grants</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383&#038;cpage=1#comment-2201</link>
		<dc:creator>obama grants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383#comment-2201</guid>
		<description>Your blog and the articles I&#039;ve read here are of great value. Thank you for the time invested in this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your blog and the articles I&#8217;ve read here are of great value. Thank you for the time invested in this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican/Democrat Job Creation Graph (Congress) &#171; The Sagamore Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383&#038;cpage=1#comment-1569</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican/Democrat Job Creation Graph (Congress) &#171; The Sagamore Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383#comment-1569</guid>
		<description>[...] Job Creation Graph&#160;(Congress) I found the original graph here, while examining PSLarkin&#8217;s Bush/Obama job loss graph redux search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Job Creation Graph&nbsp;(Congress) I found the original graph here, while examining PSLarkin&#8217;s Bush/Obama job loss graph redux search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Reader 3-12-2010, News &#38; Commentary</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383&#038;cpage=1#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Reader 3-12-2010, News &#38; Commentary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>[...] over at politicalmathblog.com digs into data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics and creates another excellent post. The short version:      tweetmeme_style = &#039;compact&#039;;    Email, Print, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over at politicalmathblog.com digs into data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics and creates another excellent post. The short version:      tweetmeme_style = &#39;compact&#39;;    Email, Print, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debunking the &#8220;Republican Congress Creates Jobs&#8221; Chart Or “How To Make Numbers Say Anything You Want”</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383&#038;cpage=1#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>Debunking the &#8220;Republican Congress Creates Jobs&#8221; Chart Or “How To Make Numbers Say Anything You Want”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383#comment-1275</guid>
		<description>[...] lay out the script I had written for debunking the chart I created that asked the question &#8220;Does a Republican Congress Create More Jobs?&#8221; and then implied with a chart that this was indeed the case. I&#8217;ll walk through some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lay out the script I had written for debunking the chart I created that asked the question &#8220;Does a Republican Congress Create More Jobs?&#8221; and then implied with a chart that this was indeed the case. I&#8217;ll walk through some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debunking the Obama Stimulus Chart Or &#8220;How To Make Numbers Say Anything You Want&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383&#038;cpage=1#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>Debunking the Obama Stimulus Chart Or &#8220;How To Make Numbers Say Anything You Want&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383#comment-1274</guid>
		<description>[...] I have the greatest readers of all time and many of you have pointed out that my rebuttal chart (seen here) commits many of the same fallacies that the Obama chart [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have the greatest readers of all time and many of you have pointed out that my rebuttal chart (seen here) commits many of the same fallacies that the Obama chart [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Correlation does not imply Causation &#124; VizWorld.com</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383&#038;cpage=1#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator>Correlation does not imply Causation &#124; VizWorld.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383#comment-1267</guid>
		<description>[...] attempts to paint one party as being better for jobs and the other party as being a jobs killer. Matthias Shapiro has created the third chart to the right, and he makes the same mistake that the other charts have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] attempts to paint one party as being better for jobs and the other party as being a jobs killer. Matthias Shapiro has created the third chart to the right, and he makes the same mistake that the other charts have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383&#038;cpage=1#comment-1211</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383#comment-1211</guid>
		<description>Hey Matthias,

Here&#039;s an article that reports similar findings with regard to debt:  http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=522949

Here&#039;s the main point:
&quot;During the most recent seven years that the Democrats have controlled Congress, their deficits have averaged $619 billion a year, or 5.3% of the gross domestic product (GDP). During the most recent seven years that the Republicans have controlled Congress, their deficits have averaged $93 billion a year, or 0.6% of GDP. Over their entire seven-year spans, the Democrats&#039; deficit spending has totaled $4.3 trillion, the Republicans&#039; $651 billion.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matthias,</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an article that reports similar findings with regard to debt:  <a href="http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=522949" rel="nofollow">http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=522949</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the main point:<br />
&#8220;During the most recent seven years that the Democrats have controlled Congress, their deficits have averaged $619 billion a year, or 5.3% of the gross domestic product (GDP). During the most recent seven years that the Republicans have controlled Congress, their deficits have averaged $93 billion a year, or 0.6% of GDP. Over their entire seven-year spans, the Democrats&#8217; deficit spending has totaled $4.3 trillion, the Republicans&#8217; $651 billion.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Berman</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383&#038;cpage=1#comment-1202</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Berman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383#comment-1202</guid>
		<description>I like most of your charts/videos (and have done posts on many of them as well) ... but the sample section is way to small here.  Unless you are trying to say that had the Republicans remained in control we would have avoided the recent bust, you need to go back at least a few decades if not a full century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like most of your charts/videos (and have done posts on many of them as well) &#8230; but the sample section is way to small here.  Unless you are trying to say that had the Republicans remained in control we would have avoided the recent bust, you need to go back at least a few decades if not a full century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You know what they say about pictures &#171; Politicaljunkie Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383&#038;cpage=1#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator>You know what they say about pictures &#171; Politicaljunkie Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=383#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>[...] Political Math asks: Does A Republican Congresss Create More Jobs? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Political Math asks: Does A Republican Congresss Create More Jobs? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
